Fish Hatchery – Ten Pound Island. John Hoagland, circa 1930. In a far sighted effort to maintain fish stocks, this hatchery provided lobster and cod fry from eggs. Operated by the US Fish Commission, it ran from 1889 to 1954. Hoagland was an American painter active in the 1930s. Framed, $300
It’s an expression that came fresh off the docks. When a fisherman wanted to invoke the utmost superlative, he’d say, “finest kind.” Eventually usage morphed to more mundane levels.
“How ya dooin?”
“Finest kind!”
But these days life along the waterfront is anything
but the finest kind.
In an effort to conserve a
dwindling natural resource the federal government has subjected New England’s
fisheries to draconian restrictions. In the old days, catch was controlled by
such measures as net size and days at sea. Lately, however, these efforts have
been replaced by “catch shares.” Modeled on the carbon shares system, each area of the fisheries is assigned a
“total allowable catch.” This catch limit is divided among fishery
participants, whose haul will thus be within the limits set by NOAA scientists, ensuring
survival of the resource.
Sounds good in theory. But in
practice it has had two disastrous consequences.
Under NOAA administrator - the
Rosa Klebb-like Jane Lubchenco
- the catch shares system was applied with a welter of nitpicking regulations,
impossible for anyone to fully comprehend, let alone follow. NOAA cops pursued
violators with a ferocity that bordered on outright persecution. Horror stories
abound. My neighbor Paul Cohan, skipper of the day boat Sasquatch
got whacked with a $20,000 fine for having a piece of survival gear
a week late for inspection. Others have been slapped with five figure fines for
inadvertently bringing in a catch that was a few pounds over the limit. To make
matters worse, an investigation by the Commerce Department’s Inspector General revealed that these fines were
being used by the NOAA cops to purchase cabin cruisers, foreign vacations, and
other inappropriate toys. The government is in the process of returning some of
the fine money, but the damage has been done. As a final insult, the bad cops,
when caught, weren't punished. They were simply transferred. But it gets worse.
My daughter Celia’s significant
other, Adam Novello, fishes on a family boat, Captain Novello.
Their catch limit is so severe that they can’t come close to making a living
- Adam and Celia won’t be buying a
house anytime soon – and some day Adam's family may have to get out of the business altogether,
selling their allotted catch shares to someone else. Then, probably sooner than
later, those catch shares will get sold to someone else further up the line,
and then to someone even bigger.
At the end of the day fishing
rights will be controlled by a few concerns with unlimited financing – an
outcome comparable to the notorious "inclosure acts" in Britain in the 18th
and 19th centuries.
So, in the name of preserving a
resource, our government is destroying a way of life and placing what was formerly
a commons – the ocean – in the hands of a few mighty corporations.
If you are inclined to
conspiracy theories, here’s one for you. The Environmental Defense Fund, the
people who conceived of this scheme in the first place, is backed, in part, by giant energy concerns
like TXU. The Pew Charitable Trusts with deep roots in Big Oil
have
also been major supporters of the catch shares system. And what’s out there in
the soon-to-be corporately controlled ocean? Underneath all those fish?
Giant oil reserves, that’s
what.
Anyway, back to the painting pictured
at the top of this entry.
It’s an image of the iconic Ten
Pound Island light house, my totem. The lower building to the left of the island is the fish hatchery
sponsored by the US Fish Commission, predecessor to NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service.
The hatchery was in operation
from 1889 to 1954. Working in concert with government vessels like the Grampus,
they collected hydrographic data and made studies of quantity and distribution of various species
of fish. They also raised cod and lobster eggs and distributed juveniles in New
England waters.
They must have been doing
something right because they stayed in business for 65 years.
Yet, despite all the hullabaloo
about the disappearance of food fish in New England waters, no one has
considered re-opening a fish hatchery. The Obama administration has declared
our fisheries to be a “disaster,” which paves the way for Congress to fund
emergency relief. Of course, Congress shot down the first appropriation, and it
may be years before we get any federal help in the form of low interest loans,
training programs, or infrastructure improvements.
But I think it would be great
to have a fish hatchery back on Ten Pound Island – Finest Kind!
Such a move
might invigorate the fisheries and provide some work for the fishing families
whose livelihoods have been destroyed by well-meaning (or perhaps deeply
scheming) conservationists.
ALBUM OF TWENTY-ONE PHOTOGRAPHS
OF GLOUCESTER MACKEREL SEINING, 1903, BY JULIAN DIMOCK. Dimock was born in 1873 and died in 1945. He
was a professional photographer, best known for his photographs of African
Americans in South Carolina in 1904 - 1905. A collection of 155 of these images
was published in 2002 as “Camera Man’s Journey.” The photographs here were
taken in 1903 for Outing magazine. They are silver gelatin prints measuring 7
3/4 x 5 3/4 inches, and they depict all phases of mackerel seining from
Gloucester schooners. Dimock’s card is tipped onto the front pastedown. It
contains the inscription, “To Captain Charles H. Harty in memory of a pleasant
trip made possible by his courtesy. Julian A. Dimock. Bull Run N.Y. Harty was a
Gloucester skipper who later served as an official in the International
Fisherman’s Races against the Bluenose. At the back of the album are six
smaller photos of southern fishermen - one with a live alligator - and a final
photo of a man, possibly Dimock, with two large dogs. $1500








Greg, I don't want to rush to the defense of Pew Charitable Trusts, but linking it to Big Oil is a little over the top. The various Pew enterprises were indeed funded by two descendants of the founder of Sun Oil, but there is no evidence whatever to link the trusts to Big Oil concerns. On the contrary, Pew was a leader in opposing oil exploration on George's Bank.
ReplyDeleteIf you followed that analogy, when I received grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and Rockefeller Brothers Fund to organize arms control publications and conferences, I must have been in the pay of Standard Oil. And for five years I was a program director for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Big Steel!
Duly noted. I was simply presenting the #1 current conspiracy theory..."If you are inclined to conspiracy theories, here’s one for you." Cheers! G
Delete